Sunday, August 26, 2012

DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE


I live alone now, in a Government bunglow. This means I am now in permanent charge of making a few thousand square-feet of the universe not burn-down, explode, collapse, or breed Ebola. I have responsibilities; I need to make sure bills are paid, I need to know when the garbagemen come, and I need to figure out why neighing sounds come out of my neighbour’s window at 3 am. Like any self-respecting single man, I will probably destroy everything in a six kilometre radius while trying to stay on top of things, if left to my own devices. So, like every government employee, I got lot of domestic helps, they themselves are paid government employees (their combined salary is three to four times my own salary).

One is a cleaner, two others are cooks. They’re both really sweet ladies, and they have a lot in common. They both get sick a lot, mostly on weekends. 1 is their favourite number, because it’s the one on the calendar that means ‘payday’. And they both have very large families. My cleaner alone has six grandmothers and twelve grandfathers. Heck, seven of them died this year, two within 48 hours of each other on Janmashtmi weekend. But still, it’s a pretty simple system. Government pays them both good money, and in exchange, they cook, they clean, and they intensely hate each other.

When you first get household help, you’re taught the first rule of household help club; no household help may be allowed to like any other household help. The last time I saw two people meet and fall in hate so quickly, Rahul Mahajan was getting married on TV. Their hatred for each other is more bizarre because their jobs only require them to be in the same room for two hours every day. For one twenty minutes every day, the cook cooks and the cleaner does the dishes. I’m not sure what point in that process is so complicated and stressful that it led to a two-hour brawl that ended in one of them saying “Sir yeh chudail peeche se g** khaati hai.”
I’ve learnt since that most fights between the household helps happen for one of three reasons:

1) One of them does too much work and thus threatens the other one, who is afraid she’ll get fired and replaced entirely by the first one.
2) Neither of the two does any work.
3 One tells the other how to do the work.

Reason number three is the most terrifying. Because one thing that pisses a woman off more than being told what to do by a guy, is being told what to do by another woman. And the only thing that pisses a woman off even more than that is when she’s told this in front of a man. The brawl they had this week began when the cleaner told the cook to use a spoon, and not her wet hands to take out aata.

When she heard this, a look passed over my cook’s face. It was a look that said “There was only one woman in the world who could tell me what to do, and I know for a fact that you’re not my mother-in-law, because four years ago, I killed her myself, so how dare you.” She countered this attack by throwing a tantrum about not being able to work in conditions like this, and about how her pride had been bruised by this affront. This was impressive only because it was the first time I have ever seen her exhibit any sort of chef-like behaviour. On most days she just stands around overcooking things in one of two flavours; tasteless, or Flamethrower Filled With The Burning Souls of Sex-Offenders.

My cleaner responded with a salvo about how the cook was a liar, a cheater, and a back-biting she-devil who she would never speak to again. I will never ever do any work with her or help her in any way, she swore. And if she talks to me, she said rather unnecessarily, I will slap her. I wanted to say something, but she was holding a knife, and takes the local passenger every day. So instead, I gave them duties that will now keep them separated, and wandered back into my living room, massaging my head as I sat down on the couch and wondered where I’d heard this relentless juvenile squabbling before. And then my hand hit the remote and MTV came on, and I just knew.

Monday, August 6, 2012

ORDEAL THAT IS CALLED ROADIES

 Yes ! it , the inevitable happended again , being jobless ( synonymus to a Public servant) , and being in a shitty place named Dahod some where in Tribal Gujarat, these days i am watching Saas bahu serials regularly , in betweeen , i again was subjected to agony of watching " The Roadies"- Chandigarh Edition .If the Earth is a petri dish and human-beings are bacteria, then Roadies is the point where the bacteria go rogue and become a terminal disease. Roadies is, to put it simply, an indefensibly awful show. I don't even know why they call it Roadies. They could just call it "Stupid People on TV: Chandigarh Edition".

This is a show where contestants are humiliated, beaten, sworn at, abused and screamed at by a pair of judges who look like a malnourished version of Right Said Fred. If contestants survive that onslaught, they get put on TV, where they are humiliated, beaten, sworn at, abused and screamed at by each other. All this because they "want to be a Roadies".

More entertaining is the fact that these kids almost seem to enjoy being put through the ordeal, like they think we're laughing with them. This may also have a lot to do with the fact that the average Roadies contestant has the IQ of oatmeal. I mean, you have to be reasonably stupid to take shit from two guys who thought being in Tees Maar Khan was a good idea. How stupid is the average Roadies contestant? Well, one confessed she'd attempted to once kill herself. When asked why, she said it was because a friend did black magic on her. Another, when asked a question he had no answer to, simply pointed at his sneakers and says "Look, I am cool. I have Skechers brand shoes. Just got from US. Not launched in India also." Unsurprisingly, he went far on the show.

And the point is… well, the point is what exactly? If they survive the ordeal, one guy gets a motorcycle, another becomes a VJ on MTV, the one that comes third celebrates by going on another reality show, and two others realize nobody watches MTV anymore, so they go off and make an MMS and become properly famous instead.

In the end though, I'm as guilty as anybody else. I love Roadies. I'm transfixed by it in the same way that I am by the sight of two dogs mating; it's horrible, and yet riveting. It's like watching common sense hang itself live on TV, and everybody loves a good hanging.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

JISM 2 , SUNNY LEONE AND ME


Guys my book is in final shape, (it sounds like “bomb is ready”) of course, final shape means, it got rejected by two reputed publishers, and was awarded for having maximum number of typographical/grammatical errors. What surprised me was a comment by the third not so well known publisher that “The literary content of my book is on the higher side of sexuality” (my god, I must commend his pre natal sex determination capabilities). Im still figuring out what he exactly meant, but issue here is of hypocrisy. This is a country where everyone likes to pretend sex doesn't even exist. Even though, with a population of 1.2 billion people, we are the world's second-largest evidence of the fact that it does. The other day I made a comment on Sunny leone’s Jism 2, one of my friend’s reaction was, sheesh ! U saw Sunny leone’s porn also????  As a matter of fact, I am a man. And men watch porn. It's like peeing standing up. It's what we do. If that surprises you, you should probably get back in your ship and go back to whatever nebula it is that you came from.
People might have remembered three ministers in Karnataka were caught watching pornography on a cellphone in the Karnataka Assembly. The resultant scandal has been dubbed porngate (on a side-note, great name for a website), and has got me thinking; we need a new way of naming scams and scandals. We've used 'gate' for over 30 years now, and it's getting a bit stale. Also, what will we do when a water scam breaks? That one's already taken, and even though we live in an era of reboots, I reckon it'll all get a bit awkward.

While it is embarrassing, porngate is also slightly impressive because it proves that unlike Kapil Sibal, these men know how to use technology. It takes some navigating to be able to download and sync videos onto your phone, and I didn't think politicians knew that the 21st century had been invented yet. Then again, I can't think of a better way to get men to learn technology than telling them that if they do, there's hardcore X-rated action to be found on the other side. It's how the entire 20th century was won, and why should things be any different now?


Some reports pause to point out the irony that one of the men caught watching the video was (until porngate) the Women and Child Development Minister. The media seems surprised and outraged because just a month ago, he'd said women should dress conservatively to avoid sexual assault. I'd like to step in here and say that his statements (and position) are irrelevant to what happened. He could advocate that we ban women altogether, and it still wouldn't matter, because he is a man. Also, his statement only proves that he's a hypocrite, and if a hypocritical politician surprises you, you are alien to this earth.

Three ministers were caught watching pornography in the Assembly. What I love about this country is that we're outraged at the first half of that sentence, not the second half. A lot of the outrage seems to stem from the fact that they watched porn at all, and not at the larger issue, which is that they watched it in the Assembly, i.e. at work. I'm going to stick my neck out here and say grow up, pornography isn't the problem.

It is not an inherently bad thing. Pornography is, for many, their first introduction to the very concept of sex. Pornography powers the digital economy. Pornography practically keeps all of Eastern Europe employed.

What is outrageous is that they watched it in the Assembly. Not because it is one of the highest institutions in the land, or because we should hold it sacred (look at who we elect, it's practically the opposite), but because, very simply, they weren't focusing on work. If I watched pornography at work, and didn't alt-Tab the browser window fast enough, I'd get fired just because I was wasting work-hours. And hadn't been nice enough to tell my colleagues how to bypass the office-firewall.

Their defense has also been lamentable. Some MLA/MP of BJP belonging to Goa, leapt to their rescue with "They were only watching it. Not doing it." I will leave that sentence there for you to understand the full horror of its implications.

The ministers themselves have said that they were watching the video for 'research' on violence against women, and they were highlighting the point by watching footage from a 'rave party' off the coast of Karnataka. This is the political equivalent of "those magazines are not mine, I'm just keeping them for a friend."

The ministers also said that rave parties are bad, and responsible for a host of problems. If by 'rave parties' they mean the BJP and the Congress, I have to say, I agree.